Clinical Results
 
Imaging

Smoothie Family

  1. Munechika H, Hiramatsu Y, et al. A prospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to iohexol in urography and computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:185-194.

  2. Wagner S, Breiteneder H. The latex-fruit syndrome. Biochemical Society Transactions 2002; 30(part 6):935-940.

  3. Neugut AL, Ghatak AT and Miller RL. Anaphylaxis in the United States: An investigation into its epidemiology. Archives of Internal Medicine 2001; 61(1):15-21.

  4. Perkin JE. The latex and food allergy connection. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2000; 100(11):1381-1384.

  5. Poley GE and Slater JE. Latex allergy. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2000; 105(6):1054-1062.

  6. Kim KT, Hussain H. Prevalence of food allergy in 137 latex-allergic patients. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 1999; 20(2):95-97.

  7. Sanchez-Monge R, Blanco C, Diaz-Perales A, et al. Isolation and characterization of major banana allergens: Identification as fruit class I chitinases. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 1999; 29(5):673-680.

  8. Tücke J, Posch A, Baur X, et al. Latex type I sensitization and allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: Evaluation of cross-reactivity to some foods. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 1999; 10(3):160-167.

  9. Diaz-Perales A, Collada C, Blanco C, et al. Cross-reactions in the latex-fruit syndrome: A relevant role of chitinases but not of complex asparagine-linked glycans. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 1999; 104(3 pt 1):681-687.

  10. Quagliano P, Vallarino L. Parameters affecting the precipitation of ionic iodinated contrast media. American Journal of Roentgenology (Published Abstract) 1999; 172:43.

  11. Ridley LJ. Allergic reactions to oral iodinated contrast agents: Reactions to oral contrast. Australasian Radiology 1998; 42:114-117.

  12. Apter S, Gayer G, et al. Urinary excretion of orally ingested gastrografin on CT. Abdom Imaging 1998; 23:297-300.

  13. Quagliano P, Austin, Jr R. Oral contrast agents for CT: A comparison of transit times and side effects. American Journal of Roentgenology (Published Abstract) 1997; 168:37.

  14. Miller SH. Anaphylactoid reaction after oral administration of diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium solution. AJR 1997; 168:959-961.

  15. Marik PE, Patel SY. Anaphylactoid reaction to oral contrast agent. AJR 1997; 168:1623-1624.

  16. Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, editors. Computed Tomography of the Gastrointestinal Tract. CV Mosby Company 1986.

  17. Carr DH, Banks LM. Comparison of barium and diatrizoate bowel labeling agents in computed tomography. The British Journal of Radiology 1985; 58:393-394.

  18. Nyman U, Dinnetz G, Andersson L. E-Z-CAT, an oral contrast medium for use in computed tomography of the abdomen. Acta Radiologica Diagnosis 1984; 25:121-124.

  19. Chambers SE, Best JJK. A comparison of dilute barium and dilute water-soluble contrast in opacification of the bowel for abdominal computed tomography. Clinical Radiology 1984; 35:463-464.

  20. Kivisaari L, Kormano M. A comparison of diatrizoate and barium sulfate bowel markers in clinical CT. Europ J Radiol 1982; 2:33-34.

  21. Megibow AJ, Bosniak MA. Dilute barium as a contrast agent for abdominal CT. AJR 1980; 134:1273-1274.

  22. Basu A, MD. The effect of compliance with oral contrast media protocols for abdominal CT on bowel opacification and diagnostic ability. European Journal of Radiology.

  23. Basu A, MD, Specialist Registrar; Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK: Personal Communication.


Back to Top